The current panic on drones near airports

There has been a spate of incidents where the various news outlets have someone flying a drone (insert stock picture of a dji phantom 2 here) within feet of an aircraft!

Unless they've suddenly stopped making aircraft out of aircraft grade aluminium and decided to start using paper a drone is not going to bring down a jet airliner. If it hits its props will snap and it will plummet out of the sky.

If it got sucked into the engines it might bring down a jet but still any sizable jet liner has to be able to fly on a single engine for quite a long way to be certified for international routes. It's unlikely it manages to fly through two or three or four engines in one go.

Yes these morons should stop flying near airports (why are they doing it in the first place? Are they plane spotters that want to get an up close and personal view?) but the risk here is pretty low.

There are no studies on the dangers drones pose to commercial aviation as such. There is this study that uses data from bird strike to estimate the possible risk. They concluded the risk of any collision, including the majority which would cause no injuries and no fatalities, with any UAS is around 3.06x10−5 per 100,000 flight hours.

Some of these dangers are getting taken care of in software for the more smart drones. A lot of the DJI machines and some of the 3DR already enforce the height limits to prevent a drone going above 400ft (in the us). There has been suggestions of loading airport locations into their gps software and adding no fly zones where the things will refuse to fly or fly into. That's not going to prevent the person that builds a machine themselves.

It's typical overblown tabloid nonsense exaggerating the risk. There are incidences where people have caused damage by flying where they shouldn't but those times were typically people flying near fires preventing firefighting aircraft from coming near and therefore allowing the fires to continue to burn destroying more property and risking lives.

We've already gotten a registration system here in the states partly due to this sort of thing (although how that helps catch these people is beyond me people that do this sort of thing either won't register or if they do the chance of getting caught is slim). It's a case of morons ruining it for everyone else. But the associated risks of drones near aircraft is blown way out of proportion and isn't helping.

Comments

If I were an airport Head of Security, my current primary concern would be;
+ =

Seems a fairly cheap way of bypassing most security (and consider how much of an airport is dedicated to that), and hitting a plane at it's most vulnerable. If you are the sort of dick-head that wants to kill hundreds of people, and make a statement, with the added bonus that it's a repeatable trick for a single idiot (unlike the more traditional "dynamite waistcoat" method), I can see if being very tempting...

babychaos's picture

I think the concern is real but it's not going to be the the DJI/CX/3DR crowd. As more ready-to-fly cheap drones come out of China - we're going to see problems with the idiots. I agree that the jet should be able to fly on a single engine. Also, I agree that the GPS restrictions will just be turned off or not fitted to Chinese drones.

I agree with Pete. A 10" prop octo is more than powerful enough to carry 10kg of explosives into the flight path of a jet.

As for tabloids, we only have to wait until they get bored of drones. Something else will come along. In the UK, the police are more worried about idiots with high power green laser pens.

brainwipe's picture

OH. MY. GOD.

+ =

I think we're about to hit DEFCON 2.

babychaos's picture

mount the laser on the camera gimble it's unstopable

Evilmatt's picture

'Drone' hits BA plane: Police investigate Heathrow incident - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36069002

Sparky Marky's picture

Yeah I saw that it was only a matter of time indeed probably happened a few times and no one noticed. unless it hits an engine it's not going to do much.

Evilmatt's picture

Still no credible solutions.

brainwipe's picture

I think there is a real opportunity here to start up a company running drone photography trips, they could get special permission to have supervised drone flyby events in all kinds of otherwise restricted locations.

Bigger Rob's picture

This just in drone may have actually been a plastic bag government calls for GPS with geofencing to be installed on all plastic bags and changes to the law limiting plastic bag use to under 400 ft.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/21/drone-believed-to-have-hit-br...

Evilmatt's picture

Could it have been an Amazon prototype self delivering drone bag?

Bigger Rob's picture