Are the FBI just asleep at the wheel or have they gone totally mad they interogate people as terrorists and deport them merely on a random email with no real evidence and now they think food preferences denote terrorists.
the article says "It was torpedoed by the head of the FBI’s criminal investigations division, Michael A. Mason, who argued that putting somebody on a terrorist list for what they ate was ridiculous — and possibly illegal."
That should probably read "possibly illegal for now but give it six months it's the sort of forward thinking we need in anti terror policy" It's the sort of pointless stuff that I can see politicians would try to pull on top of the current "holding people without charge as long as we want is a good thing it keeps us safe! No this isn't soviet Russia - TO THE GULAG TO YOU FOR YOUR INSOLENCE!"